Last updated September 28, 2025
Introduction
Acute pericarditis is inflammation of the pericardial sac, typically causing sharp, pleuritic, positional chest pain. Its ECG findings can mimic STEMI and Early Repolarization, but no single feature is pathognomonic. The most characteristic patterns are outlined below.
ECG findings
Diffuse Concave ST Elevation with reciprocal STD in aVR (± V1)
- Pericardial/epicardial inflammation produces a global “current of injury,” elevating ST segments diffusely; aVR (±V1) shows reciprocal depression.
Diffuse PR Segment Depression w/ reciprocal PR elevation in aVR
- Atrial inflammation shifts the baseline downward (PR depression), with aVR showing reciprocal PR elevation — a relatively specific marker for pericarditis.
Spodick’s Sign
- Downward slanting of the TP segment, most evident in the inferior (II, III, avF) and lateral leads (e.g., V5–V6), reflecting pericardial irritation; useful but not universally present (29% sensitive) and present in 5% of STEMIs.
Sinus tachycardia, low voltage and electrical alternans.
- Sinus tachycardia may be a nonspecific response to pain/fever or a compensatory response to concomitant myocarditis / heart failure / pericardial effusion. Low voltage and beat-to-beat QRS amplitude variation (electrical alternans) suggest pericardial effusion. Low voltage is defined as either QRS amplitude ≤ 5 mm in all limb leads or ≤ 10 mm in all precordial leads.
A patient diagnosed with myopericarditis and a large pericardial effusion (had negative cath) Note the QRS alternans in the rhythm lead in V1. There is additionally aVL depression which suggests simultaneous myocardial injury and hence cath lab activation.
Pericarditis vs STEMI / OMI
Feature | Acute Pericarditis | STEMI |
ST Elevation Distribution | Diffuse, seen in most leads (I, II, III, aVF, V2–V6) | Regional, confined to one vascular territory (e.g., inferior, anterior) |
ST Segment Morphology | Concave (“smiley”) upward | Convex or straight (“tombstone”) upward |
PR Segment Changes | PR depression (except aVR, which shows elevation) | Rare |
Reciprocal ST Depression | Absent except aVR ± V1 | Common, mirrors anatomic distribution |
Q Waves / R-wave progression | No Q waves, R-wave progression preserved | Pathologic Q waves may form, loss of R-wave progression |
Evolution Over Time | Gradual normalization → later T-wave inversions | Rapid progression: hyperacute T → ST elevation → Q waves |
ECG Example - Pericarditis or OMI?
ECG Example - Pericarditis or OMI?
Pericarditis vs Early Repolarization
Feature | Acute Pericarditis | Early Repolarization |
ST Elevation Distribution | Diffuse across many leads (I, II, III, aVF, V2–V6) | Primarily precordial leads, often V2-V5 |
ST Segment Morphology | Concave upward | Concave upward |
J‑point Notching | Rare | Prominent “fish-hook” J-point (especially V4) |
PR Segment | PR depression in multiple leads with reciprocal PR elevation in aVR | None |
Reciprocal ST Depression | Generally absent except aVR ± V1 | Absent |
ST/T Ratio in V6 | > 0.25 favors pericarditis | < 0.25 favors early repolarization |
Clinical Context | Pleuritic, positional chest pain, friction rub, recent viral illness | Young, healthy individuals. Often incidental and stable over years |
Temporal Evolution | Stages: diffuse STE and PR↓ → normalization → T‑wave inversion | Stable pattern over time. No staged evolution. STE more pronounce during slow heart rates. |
Examples of J-point notching in Early Repolarization
From LITFL.com
ST/T ≥ 0.25 in V6
This comes from a couple small papers but not validated in large prospective ED cohorts. Studies are small and may overestimate accuracy
- Wang et al., 2003 (Am J Cardiol 92:1290–1293)
- Retrospective analysis of 35 pericarditis vs. 35 BER cases.
- ST/T ratio >0.25 in V6: sensitivity ~82%, specificity ~80% for pericarditis.
- Subsequent validation studies (small case series and ECG reviews; e.g., Brady WJ et al., Am J Emerg Med 1999; Adler et al.)
- Sensitivity ranges 70–90%, specificity 75–85% in small cohorts.
ECG Example - Pericarditis or Early Repolarization?
ECG Example - Pericarditis or Early Repolarization?
Key Points
- Pericarditis often mimics STEMI and early repolarization, but no single ECG finding is diagnostic — interpretation requires pattern recognition and clinical context.
- Diffuse concave ST elevation with reciprocal ST depression in aVR (±V1) is the most classic pattern; PR depression with reciprocal PR elevation in aVR is relatively specific when present.
- Spodick’s sign (downsloping TP segment) supports pericarditis but is low sensitivity (~30%) and not entirely specific (seen in ~5% of STEMIs).
- Sinus tachycardia, low voltage, and electrical alternans point toward large pericardial effusion rather than isolated pericarditis.
- Key STEMI differentiators: regional rather than diffuse ST elevation, convex/tombstone morphology, reciprocal ST depression beyond aVR/V1, and Q-wave or R-wave progression loss.
- Key BER differentiators: stable pattern over time, prominent J-point notching (“fish-hook”) in V4, ST/T ratio in V6 <0.25 (vs >0.25 favoring pericarditis).
- Always integrate clinical features (pleuritic, positional pain, friction rub, recent viral illness) and, if uncertain, use serial ECGs and bedside echo to clarify diagnosis.
References
- Adler A, Nikus K, Birnbaum Y. Electrocardiographic differential diagnosis of acute pericarditis, benign early repolarization, and ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2012;17(2):141-145. doi:10.1111/j.1542-474X.2012.00489.x
- Bhardwaj A, Kumar V, Aggarwal S, et al. Utility of ST/T ratio in differentiating acute pericarditis from early repolarization and left ventricular hypertrophy patterns. Am J Med Sci. 2013;346(4):289-294. doi:10.1097/MAJ.0b013e318262c2a8
- Brady WJ, Mattu A, Tabas JA. Critical Decisions in Emergency and Acute Care Electrocardiography. Wiley-Blackwell; 2009.
- Brady WJ, Chan TC, Pollack M. Electrocardiographic manifestations: acute pericarditis. Am J Emerg Med. 1999;17(7):768-775. doi:10.1016/S0735-6757(99)90190-0
- Chou TC, Surawicz B. Chou’s Electrocardiography in Clinical Practice. 6th ed. Saunders/Elsevier; 2008.
- Davila C. The ECG. Updated ed. Self-published; 2024.
- ECG Essentials. Pericardial Disease. Published April 29, 2025. Accessed September 27, 2025.
- Life in the Fast Lane (LITFL) ECG Library. Pericarditis. Published August 1, 2020. Accessed September 27, 2025.
- Podrid PJ. Podrid’s Real-World ECGs: A Master’s Approach to the Art and Practice of Clinical ECG Interpretation. Vol 6. Cardiotext Publishing; 2016.
- Sarda AK, Thute P. Importance of ECG in the diagnosis of acute pericarditis and myocardial infarction: a review article. Cureus. 2022;14(10):e30633. doi:10.7759/cureus.30633
- Wang K, Asinger RW, Marriott HJL. ST-segment elevation in conditions other than acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2128-2135. doi:10.1056/NEJMra022580
- Wave Maven. ECG Wave Maven—Pericardial Disease Library. Accessed September 27, 2025. https://ecgwavemaven.com
- Zhan ZQ, Nikus K, Birnbaum Y. PR depression with multilead ST elevation and ST depression in aVR by left circumflex artery occlusion: how to differentiate from acute pericarditis. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2020;25(6):e12752. doi:10.1111/anec.12752
This post is for education and not medical advice.